Impeachment articles filed against Attorney General Ravnsborg

{{featured_button_text}}


Jason Ravnsborg


Rep. Will Mortenson, R-Pierre, introduced articles of impeachment Tuesday against Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg after he declined to resign after hitting and killing Joseph Boever with his car outside of Highmore in September.



Rep. Will Mortenson, R-Pierre, introduced articles of impeachment against Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg Tuesday afternoon. 




Ravnsborg was charged with three misdemeanors last week, causing political leaders from the South Dakota Democratic Party to Gov. Kristi Noem calling on him to resign his position

Mortenson is the resolution’s prime sponsor, but it is supported by House Majority Leader Kent Peterson, R-Salem, and House Minority Leader Jamie Smith, D-Sioux Falls. The resolution was not discussed on the House floor Tuesday.

House Resolution 7001 gives two reasons for the impeachment proceedings: causing the death of Boever and for statements and actions following Boever’s death that fail to meet the standard of the Office of Attorney General.

“Following the collision, including during his reporting of the collision and the resulting investigation, Jason Ravnsborg undertook actions unbecoming the Attorney General. Jason Ravnsborg’s statements and actions failed to meet the standard of the Office of the Attorney General,” the resolution states.

Mortenson said his decision to file the resolution was the result of months of consideration and advice. He said in a statement that while the charging decision may have been correct, the Attorney General “owes a higher duty” to both the state and its citizens.

Support Local Journalism

Your membership makes our reporting possible.

{{featured_button_text}}

“In his actions on the night of September 12, 2020, and following the incident, Attorney General Ravnsborg breached that duty and has lost the confidence of the people of South Dakota. When that happens, I believe the legislature has an obligation to exercise its constitutional authority to remove him from office,” Mortenson wrote in a statement.

“I do not believe Attorney General Ravnsborg belongs in prison, but I know he does not belong in the Office of the Attorney General anymore,” Mortenson wrote.

Article XVI, section 3 of the state Constitution allows the House of Representatives the sole authority to impeach state and judicial officers for “drunkenness, crimes, corrupt conduct, or malfeasance or misdemeanors in office.” Mortenson said this should only be used in “grave circumstances,” which he contended fits the situation.

“In this case, a state official caused the death of a citizen and failed to comport himself in the standards we expect following the incident. Our state has never had such an occurrence, where the elected official refused to resign. In short, this is clearly an exceptional case,” he said.

House leaders agreed.

“This isn’t about party or politics. It’s about doing the right thing for South Dakota,” said Peterson. “We must hold our elected leaders to a high standard. In this case, the Attorney General has failed to meet that standard, and we owe it to the people to bring these Articles,” Peterson said in a statement.

“What happened was a tragedy for all involved. However, that cannot deter us from fulfilling our duties. The Attorney General has lost the confidence of the people of South Dakota, and he should be removed from office for the betterment of the state,” Smith said.

Mortenson said that the impeachment resolution is not political or personal and that he has always had a good relationship with Ravnsborg.

“We need to put principle and our people ahead of politics or our party. In South Dakota, the fact that we are in the same party means that my colleagues and I have had a lot of opportunities to spend time with Attorney General Ravnsborg. That makes this a very uncomfortable exercise, and I would ask that all members are afforded grace in their decision-making,” Mortenson said.

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.